Few topics in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu spark as much debate as belt promotions. The journey from white to black belt is a defining aspect of every Jiujiteiro’s experience, symbolizing years of dedication, growth, and mastery. But what happens when this traditional journey intersects with the evolution of the sport—specifically the rise of no-gi grappling? Should practitioners who train exclusively in no-gi be eligible for a black belt in BJJ, a martial art deeply rooted in its gi traditions?

This debate is particularly relevant in the era of modern grappling, with schools like 10th Planet Jiu-Jitsu and organizations such as ADCC showcasing the legitimacy and technical depth of no-gi Jiu-Jitsu. But the question remains: does the absence of a gi mean the absence of a black belt?

The Traditional Argument: The Gi Is Essential

For many, the gi is an indispensable part of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. Training in the gi not only allows practitioners to work with grips and controls specific to the attire but also emphasizes the discipline and tradition of the art.

Advocates for the gi argue that its presence teaches humility and patience, as the slower pace of gi grappling often demands more deliberate and strategic movement. Furthermore, the gi is seen as a leveling tool, removing the athletic advantages often prevalent in no-gi grappling and forcing practitioners to focus on technique over strength or speed.

From this perspective, earning a BJJ black belt without ever donning the gi might be seen as bypassing a crucial component of the art. For traditionalists, the gi represents more than just a uniform—it’s a connection to the roots of Jiu-Jitsu.

The Modern Argument: No-Gi Is Its Own Art

On the other hand, no-gi grappling has evolved into a distinct discipline, with its own unique techniques, strategies, and rule sets. Leg locks, wrist control, and transitions often play a more prominent role in no-gi grappling than in gi Jiu-Jitsu. Athletes like Gordon Ryan and Craig Jones have demonstrated that no-gi grappling is a technical art form in its own right, capable of standing shoulder-to-shoulder with traditional BJJ.

Proponents of no-gi black belts argue that expertise in this discipline should be recognized independently of gi experience. After all, if the goal of Jiu-Jitsu is efficiency and adaptability in grappling, no-gi practitioners who achieve mastery should be eligible for the same rank as their gi counterparts. Schools like 10th Planet have adopted this approach, awarding belts to no-gi practitioners based on skill and time on the mats.

Should No-Gi Practitioners Receive Black Belts?

The question ultimately boils down to perspective. If Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu is defined strictly by its gi traditions, then the absence of gi training might disqualify someone from earning a black belt. However, if BJJ is viewed as a broader grappling system—encompassing both gi and no-gi techniques—then a no-gi black belt could be justified.

One potential compromise is to introduce separate ranking systems for gi and no-gi practitioners. This way, practitioners could receive recognition for their expertise in either discipline without conflating the two. Another option is for instructors to evaluate no-gi practitioners on a case-by-case basis, ensuring they meet the standards of a black belt regardless of their attire.

A Balancing Act Between Tradition and Evolution

The debate over no-gi black belts reflects a larger conversation about the evolution of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. As the sport continues to grow and diversify, its community must navigate the balance between preserving tradition and embracing innovation.

Whether or not no-gi practitioners should earn black belts under the traditional BJJ system will likely remain a hot topic for years to come. But one thing is clear: both gi and no-gi Jiu-Jitsu are valuable components of the grappling world, deserving of recognition and respect.